Clearer oversight across exchanges, without changing how you approve decisions
Tebrunavyo brings balances, activity, and risk checks into one read-only view, so you can review allocation and rebalance proposals with consistent context before anything moves.
Read-only connections. No trade execution without your explicit approval. Informational tooling only, not investment advice.
One place to review, document, and decide
Managing several exchange accounts often means switching tabs, reconciling exports, and relying on memory for risk limits. Tebrunavyo reduces that friction by standardizing reporting and keeping every proposal tied to the same checks.
- ✓Less manual reconciliation: see holdings and recent activity side by side instead of merging spreadsheets.
- ✓Consistent review context: each rebalancing proposal references the same allocation view and guardrail status.
- ✓Clearer responsibility: approvals, rejections, and notes are recorded for later review.
- ✓Calmer operations: limits and alerts surface drift early, before it becomes urgent.
| Item | Context | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Allocation summary | 3 sources unified | Ready |
| Concentration check | Against set limit | Within limit |
| Rebalance proposal #042 | Awaiting approval | On hold |
Proposals remain drafts until you approve. Tebrunavyo does not execute trades on its own.
Designed for careful, repeatable review
Each advantage supports the same workflow: observe across venues, check against documented rules, then decide with a full audit trail.
Unified multi-exchange view
Consolidate read-only balances and activity so allocation can be assessed as a whole, not exchange by exchange.
- Standardized reporting format
- Side-by-side account comparison
- Reduced tab-switching and exports
Approval-based proposals
AI-supported analysis drafts rebalancing ideas for your review. Nothing moves until you explicitly confirm.
- Proposals stay in draft by default
- Approve, reject, or leave pending
- Decision history retained
Documented risk controls
Define concentration, allocation drift, and review thresholds once, then apply them consistently to every check.
- Clear limit definitions
- Status shown with each review
- Alerts when limits are approached
Traceable review trail
Keep proposals, decisions, and supporting context linked together for internal review and accountability.
- Proposal-to-decision linkage
- Notes and timestamps
- Exportable summaries
Read-only by design
Connections are scoped for observation and reporting. Execution only follows a separate, explicit approval step.
- Limited API permissions
- No background trading
- You retain final control
Built for routine oversight
Weekly or monthly reviews follow the same structure, making it easier to spot change and maintain discipline.
- Repeatable review layout
- Comparable period views
- Less reliance on memory
Manual tracking vs. centralized oversight
The difference is not prediction — it is structure. Tebrunavyo standardizes what you see and how you approve, while leaving judgment with you.
| Task | Manual approach | With Tebrunavyo |
|---|---|---|
| Balance review | Log in to each exchange separately | Single consolidated reporting view |
| Activity check | Compare CSV exports and timestamps | Unified activity history with consistent formatting |
| Risk assessment | Remember limits or check notes | Documented guardrails shown alongside data |
| Rebalancing idea | Calculate adjustments by hand | Draft proposal with supporting context for approval |
| Decision record | Scattered messages or memory | Approval, rejection, and notes stored together |
No autonomous execution
Centralization applies to information and drafts only. Action requires your explicit confirmation.
No performance claims
Tebrunavyo provides analysis and structure. It does not promise returns or predict market behaviour.
Steadier reviews, fewer surprises
When limits, holdings, and proposals share one screen, reviews take less effort to prepare and are easier to explain to others involved in oversight.
- ✓Prepare faster: open one summary instead of assembling data from multiple sources.
- ✓Decide with context: see why a proposal was suggested and how it relates to current limits.
- ✓Stay consistent: apply the same checks each time, regardless of market noise.
